<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.developerfriendly.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>linux</title>
 <link>http://www.developerfriendly.com/taxonomy/term/45</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Much Awesomeness</title>
 <link>http://www.developerfriendly.com/blog/awesomeness</link>
 <description>I have recently discovered a couple of &lt;em&gt;awesome&lt;/em&gt; developments which are worth mentioning:

&lt;ul&gt;
 &lt;li&gt; The &lt;a href=&#039;http://awesome.naquadah.org/&#039;&gt;Awesome &lt;em&gt;X Window Manager&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; is an active light-weight tiling window manager based on dwm. Similar to wmii or ion but seemingly more advanced and very easy to use. Version 2 is available from Debian and Ubuntu repositories so you can simply &lt;em&gt;apt-get install awesome&lt;/em&gt; ... now isn&#039;t that awesome?&lt;/li&gt;

 &lt;li&gt;
  Google has released an official version of &lt;a href=&quot;http://code.google.com/p/google-gadgets-for-linux/&quot;&gt;Google Gadgets for Linux&lt;/a&gt;. It&#039;s still early in development but the code is open source (Under the terms of the Apache License v2.0)... They don&#039;t offer pre-packaged binaries, however, it looks reasonably easy to build it. Once I have a few minutes to play I will definitely be talking about the experience. This is especially exciting for me because it&#039;s similar to the WidgetRunner project that I dabbled with over a year ago. The &lt;a href=&quot;http://code.google.com/p/google-gadgets-for-linux/wiki/HowToBuild&quot;&gt;documentation&lt;/a&gt; mentions XULRunner and Spidermonkey as dependencies so it seems like it&#039;s based on the Mozilla platform and &lt;em&gt;that&lt;/em&gt; is awesome!
 &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.developerfriendly.com/blog/awesomeness#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.developerfriendly.com/taxonomy/term/60">Awesome</category>
 <category domain="http://www.developerfriendly.com/taxonomy/term/45">linux</category>
 <category domain="http://www.developerfriendly.com/taxonomy/term/1">mozpad</category>
 <category domain="http://www.developerfriendly.com/taxonomy/term/26">WidgetRunner</category>
 <category domain="http://www.developerfriendly.com/taxonomy/term/8">XULRunner</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:22:24 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>20after4</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">63 at http://www.developerfriendly.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Firefox, Linux and Flash Transparency</title>
 <link>http://www.developerfriendly.com/node/48</link>
 <description>I just discovered &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.marcoos.com/2006/07/21/html-div-above-a-flash-animation-on-linux-its-possible/&quot;&gt;this hack&lt;/a&gt; to make it possible to use html-above-embedded flash. I&#039;m continually disappointed with Adobe and Mozilla for ignoring this long standing and very annoying bug. At least there is a hackish solution that will work for some but it doesn&#039;t really solve the problem, just helps only a little bit. Thanks to marcoos for figuring it out by reverse-engineering the google video site and thanks to google for providing the solution for our reverse-engineered pleasure . . . ;)</description>
 <comments>http://www.developerfriendly.com/node/48#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.developerfriendly.com/taxonomy/term/43">bugs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.developerfriendly.com/taxonomy/term/44">flash</category>
 <category domain="http://www.developerfriendly.com/taxonomy/term/45">linux</category>
 <category domain="http://www.developerfriendly.com/taxonomy/term/7">Mozilla</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 07:15:39 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>20after4</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">48 at http://www.developerfriendly.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
